Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40639946›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2025

Maternal occupational exposure to noise: prevalence, maternal effects and infant outcomes in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

Kristen W Van Buren, Carissa M Rocheleau, I-Chen Chen, Wayne T Sanderson, Leslie A MacDonald, Elizabeth A Masterson, Eirini Nestoridi, Elizabeth C Ailes, National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kristen W Van BurenDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA kristenvanburen511@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-6882
Carissa M RocheleauDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-1874
I-Chen ChenDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-8395
Wayne T SandersonBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department, College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-0450
Leslie A MacDonaldDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3967-534X
Elizabeth A MastersonDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-7979
Eirini NestoridiDivision for Surveillance, Research, and Promotion of Perinatal Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6555-8623
Elizabeth C AilesDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2062-8148
National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe investigated associations between occupational noise and gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-related hypertension (including pre-eclampsia/eclampsia), preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) infants.

methodsData were analysed for 7889 singleton, live-born infants without major birth defects or chromosomal disorders and their mothers from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study from 1997 to 2011. Typical maternal occupational noise exposure in all jobs held from 1 month prior to conception through the end of pregnancy was estimated by expert rater and categorised as quiet (<60 A-weighted decibels (dBA)), low (60-75 dBA), moderate (76-84 dBA) or loud (>85 dBA). Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate associations (adjusted ORs and 95% CIs) between noise exposure levels and outcomes.

resultsApproximately 77.4% of pregnant workers had quiet levels of occupational noise exposure, 11.0%, 10.1% and 1.5% had low, moderate and loud exposure levels, respectively. Compared with quiet levels of noise, pregnant workers exposed to low levels of noise had decreased odds of delivering an SGA infant (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.72; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) and those exposed to moderate levels had increased odds of delivering an SGA infant (aOR=1.37; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77). No other significant associations were observed.

conclusionMaternal occupational noise exposure below the 85 dBA threshold recognised as hazardous may be associated with SGA among infants. Elevated point estimates (>1) were observed for the highest noise exposure category and all outcomes, though CIs were wide and statistical significance was not attained. Further research is warranted to address existing knowledge gaps.

Indexed as

Maternal ExposureNoise, OccupationalOccupational ExposureAdultCongenital AbnormalitiesDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeLogistic ModelsPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthNoiseOccupational HealthPregnancy Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40639946
PMCPMC12362229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.