Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40639863›Full record

ArticleWomen's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)2025

Development and effects of a scenario-based labor nursing simulation education program using an artificial intelligence tutor: a quasi-experimental study.

Seo-A Park, Hye Young Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seo-A ParkCollege of Nursing, Kyungwoon University, Gumi, Korea.
Hye Young KimCollege of Nursing, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was conducted to determine the effects of a scenario-based labor nursing simulation education program using an artificial intelligence (AI) tutor on knowledge, critical thinking disposition, clinical performance abilities, and digital literacy.

methodsThis quasi-experimental study employed a non-equivalent control group pre- and post-test design. Seventy-two fourth-year nursing students (38 experimental, 34 control) were recruited from a university in Gumi, Korea. The experimental group participated in a scenario-based simulation education program supported by an AI tutor, while the control group engaged in conventional high-fidelity simulation training. Both groups attended sessions once per week for 2 hours over five sessions. Data were collected from August to December 2023 and analyzed using descriptive statistics, homogeneity testing, and the independent t-test.

resultsSimulation using an AI tutor resulted in significantly higher scores for the experimental group compared to the control group in nursing knowledge (t=7.03, p<.001), clinical performance (t=7.80, p=.020), and digital literacy (t=5.02, p<.001).

conclusionThe scenario-based labor nursing simulation program utilizing an AI tutor was effective in improving nursing students' delivery of knowledge, clinical performance, and digital literacy. Future research should focus on developing diverse and advanced simulation programs tailored to various areas of women's health nursing, to further enhance critical thinking and clinical judgment capabilities.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceObstetric NursingSimulation TrainingStudents, NursingAdultClinical CompetenceEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateFemaleHumansPregnancyRepublic of KoreaArtificial intelligenceEducationNursingObstetric nursingSimulation training

Identifiers

PMID40639863
PMCPMC12245539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.