ReviewClinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)2025
Measuring efficacy for myasthenia gravis treatments: A review of biomarkers used in clinical trials.
Review in Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The immune microenvironment and population heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis: implications for precision therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease that impairs neuromuscular transmission through autoantibodies, most commonly targeting acetylcholine receptors (AChR). While clinical scores like the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) and the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) are commonly used in trials, there is no gold standard biomarker for evaluating treatment efficacy. This scoping review aimed to identify which biomarkers are most frequently used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-surgical treatments of generalized myasthenia gravis. We searched five databases for English-language RCTs published before May 9, 2024. Of 6685 screened texts, 33 met inclusion criteria. A total of 33 distinct biomarkers were tracked across studies, with AChR antibodies, IgG, and IL-2 most frequently reported. Biomarkers were measured inconsistently and at varied intervals, limiting cross-study comparability. The lack of standardized biomarker use hinders the ability to assess treatment efficacy and perform meta-analyses. We recommend developing consensus guidelines to improve future trial quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.