ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
A data-intelligence-intensive bioinformatics copilot system for large-scale omics research and scientific insights.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agentic genomics: From pipeline automation to autonomous validation.Cell genomics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Computational approaches to multimodal data integration in rheumatoid arthritis: from data landscape to clinical translation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Streamline automated biomedical discoveries with agentic bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- AI for Scientific Discovery in Omics Data-Driven Precision Medicine.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in high-throughput sequencing technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) offer unprecedented opportunities for groundbreaking discoveries in bioinformatics research. However, the challenges of exponential growth of omics data and the rapid development of AI technologies require automated big biological data analysis capability and interdisciplinary knowledge-driven scientific insight. Here, we propose a data-intelligence-intensive bioinformatics copilot (Bio-Copilot) system that synergizes AI capabilities with human researchers to facilitate hypothesis-free exploratory research and inspire novel scientific insights in large-scale omics studies. Bio-Copilot forms high-quality intensive intelligence through close collaboration between multiple agents, driven by large language models (LLMs), and human researchers. To augment the capabilities of Bio-Copilot, this study devises an agent group management strategy, an effective human-agent interaction mechanism, a shared interdisciplinary knowledge database, and continuous learning strategies for the agents. We comprehensively compare Bio-Copilot against GPT-4o and several leading AI agents across diverse bioinformatics tasks, using a broad range of evaluation metrics. Bio-Copilot achieves overall state-of-the-art performance across all tasks, while showcasing exceptional task completeness. Furthermore, on application to constructing a large-scale human lung cell atlas, Bio-Copilot not only reproduces the intricate data integration process detailed in a seminal study but also introduces a recursive, multilevel annotation strategy to capture the continuous nature of cellular states and uncovers the characteristics of rare cell types, highlighting its potential to unravel hidden complexities in biological systems. Beyond the technical achievements, this study also underscores the profound implications of integrating AI capabilities with expert knowledge in accelerating impactful biological discoveries and exploring uncharted territories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.