Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40639362›Full record

ArticleDermatology (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Topical Drug Treatment of Rosacea in Switzerland: A Descriptive Study Using Swiss Claims Data.

Tamino Zappalà, Alexander A Navarini, Carola A Huber, Christoph R Meier, Julia Spoendlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamino ZappalàBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, tamino.zappala@unibas.ch.
Alexander A NavariniDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Carola A HuberDepartment of Health Sciences, Helsana Group, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph R MeierBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Julia SpoendlinBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRosacea, a chronic inflammatory condition primarily affecting the skin of the face, has long been an area of interest for pharmaceutical advancements. In Switzerland, metronidazole was the only first-line topical rosacea medication (TRM), until brimonidine was licensed in 2014 and ivermectin in 2016. We aimed to evaluate the use of TRM between 2012 and 2023 in Switzerland.

methodsWe used healthcare claims data from the Swiss health insurance "Helsana Group" between 2012 and 2023 (study period). We quantified the monthly number of claims for each TRM per 10,000 insured persons, as well as the overall and annual prevalence of patients treated with TRM in Switzerland, stratified by age (≥/<50 years) and sex in 2023. Among all continuously enrolled persons (period prevalence) and persons insured during the entire calendar year (annual prevalence), we identified all persons with at least one claim of either topical metronidazole, brimonidine, or ivermectin. We additionally evaluated the proportion of patients with only one, two to five, or more than five claims for any TRM during the study period, and stratified patients by number of different TRM claimed within the same calendar year. Lastly, we evaluated the proportion of patients with comedications of interest (i.e., class 1 or 2 topical corticosteroids or oral tetracycline-antibiotics) within the same calendar year.

resultsMetronidazole was the most frequently claimed TRM in Switzerland during the study period (5.1 claims/10,000/month) but has decreased by 11% since the market introduction of ivermectin in 2016. Ivermectin continuously increased, accounting for 43% of all TRM claims in 2023 (4.0 claims/10,000/month). The overall prevalence of patients treated with TRM was 4.7%, whereas annual prevalence was lower but increased from 0.4% (2012) to 0.7% (2023); it was highest among women ≥50 years of age (1.4%). Of all patients treated with TRM, 54% had only one claim for any TRM, while 36% had between two and five claims, mostly monotherapy of metronidazole (52%) or ivermectin (36%). Throughout the study period, approximately 7% had at least one claim for any topical corticosteroid within the same calendar year. In total, 16% claimed oral tetracycline-antibiotics (80% doxycycline), which has slightly decreased since 2017.

conclusionThe discrepancy between annual and overall prevalence suggests that many patients treated with TRM receive intermittent therapy. Despite the decline in use, metronidazole remains the most frequently used TRM in Switzerland, but the use of ivermectin increased continuously. The slight decrease in tetracycline-antibiotics among patients treated with TRM after 2017 might reflect the efficacy of ivermectin.

Indexed as

Brimonidine TartrateDermatologic AgentsIvermectinMetronidazoleRosaceaAdministration, CutaneousAdministration, TopicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleBrimonidine TartrateDermatologic AgentsIvermectinMetronidazoleDrug utilization studyHealthcare claims dataRosacea

Identifiers

PMID40639362
PMCPMC12500275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.