ArticleVision research2025
Determining fixation accuracy with optical coherence tomography and its implication on visual acuity in amblyopia.
Article in Vision research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Binocular Vision Anomalies: An Update on Prevalence, Impact, Technological and Treatment Developments and Current Challenges.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inaccurate fixation is a hallmark of strabismus and amblyopia. Recently, positional error of fixation in amblyopic children was assessed with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). This study extends the use of OCT to examine both positional error and stability of fixation in an adult population and investigates how lifelong impairment of fixation can impact visual acuity in amblyopia. Twenty macular cube scans per eye were acquired with the Cirrus HD-OCT in 30 amblyopes and 30 controls with normal binocular vision. The foveal location was identified with the instrument's software as line scan coordinates to determine the distance between the fovea and the center of the scan. The average positional error and stability of fixation were calculated utilizing the foveal location measurements. Crowded monocular distance visual acuity (VA) was obtained from each eye. Amblyopic eyes demonstrated greater position error and fixation instability compared to fellow and control eyes. Simple linear regressions revealed a significant relationship between both position error and VA and fixation stability and VA. However, with multiple regression, position error alone was the significant predictor of VA. Fixation accuracy analysis from OCT imaging provides a quantitative assessment of fixation behavior, allowing for more comprehensive clinical management of amblyopia and predicting visual acuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.