Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638906›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Interventions to Counter Health Misinformation Among Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Maryline Vivion, Valérie Reid, Valérie Trottier, Frédéric Bergeron, Isabelle Savard, Emilie Dionne, André Tourigny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maryline VivionDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6400-1024
Valérie ReidCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-9709-7194
Valérie TrottierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-1435-2043
Frédéric BergeronDirection des Services-Conseils de la Bibliothèque, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0978-7420
Isabelle SavardEducation Department, Université TÉLUQ, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6366-7847
Emilie DionneVITAM - Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1542-7472
André TourignyVITAM - Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2447-8848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contemporary society, misinformation and disinformation have emerged as significant challenges, impacting various aspects of public health and societal cohesion. Some authors argue that older adults are particularly vulnerable to the effects of misinformation due to potential digital health literacy challenges. A previous review identified pedagogical approaches most commonly adopted in interventions aiming to improve the digital literacy of older adults but did not specifically address digital health literacy.

objectiveThis scoping review protocol aims to explore digital health literacy interventions targeting health misinformation and designed specifically for older adults.

methodsFollowing the methodology outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist, this protocol delineates a systematic approach encompassing 5 stages: identification of research questions, identification of relevant studies, selection of studies, data charting, and collation of findings. Our scoping review will include peer-reviewed literature on interventions targeting misinformation for older adults. Research will be conducted on the MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. Gray literature will also be surveyed by performing a Google search to identify interventions and tools employed by public or private organizations, institutes, groups, or agencies. The databases and gray literature will be searched to identify relevant publications. Two members of our team will independently select publications to include in the review by using the Covidence review software (Veritas Health Innovation). The publications included will specifically address our research questions, be peer-reviewed, evidence-based, and published from January 1, 2005, in full-text English or French version. Data will be extracted from the included publications to mainly chart the intervention's objectives, types, target age groups, effectiveness, and risks reported. A thematic analysis will be conducted to categorize the study findings.

resultsThe funding for this project was provided in March 2024. The research questions were identified in January 2024. The databases and gray literature search strategies were developed in February 2024. The final selection of the publications; the charting, collating, and summarizing of data; along with the reporting of findings are planned for August to September 2025. The findings of this scoping review will be shared through publication in an open access journal and presentations scheduled between September and December 2025.

conclusionsThis protocol will enable us to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in combating health misinformation among older adults. The results will also be utilized for the development of interventions targeting misinformation among older adults. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/74138.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth LiteracyAgedHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicdisinformationhealth literacyinterventionmisinformationolder adults

Identifiers

PMID40638906
PMCPMC12290425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.