Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638867›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Fast, motion-robust MR elastography with distributed, generalized encoding.

Mary K Kramer, Alex M Cerjanic, Curtis L Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary K KramerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1305-9821
Alex M CerjanicDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Curtis L JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7760-131X

Funding

MRI Measurement of the Mechanical Vulnerability of the BrainU01NS112120 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
High-Resolution, Anisotropic MR Elastography of the BrainR01EB027577 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V, JOHNSON, CURTIS L · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
Mechanical integrity of memory systems in mild cognitive impairmentR01AG058853 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI JOHNSON, CURTIS L · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
In Vivo Evaluation of Brain Tissue Integrity in Aging Using a Novel Magnetic Resonance Elastography TechniqueF31AG086036 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Mary Kramer · 2024 to 2026
$136k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG086036NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058853NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027577NIH HHS F31-AG086036NIH HHS R01-AG058853NIH HHS R01-EB027577NIH HHS U01-NS112120NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS112120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMR elastography (MRE) data are susceptible to poor quality often caused by long scan times and subject motion, due in part to the specific data sampling requirements for determining motion fields to estimate mechanical properties. By reformulating how motion is encoded and estimated, a more efficient and flexible MRE method that allows for accelerated acquisition and motion robustness is established. THEORY AND

methodsA novel motion-encoding technique was implemented that uses fully distributed sampling directions in an optimized encoding matrix to collect data efficiently. These data are used in an optimization algorithm to estimate harmonic displacement fields. Simulations and in vivo brain MRE data demonstrate the performance of distributed encoding compared with traditional encoding. Estimation of motion from partial data sets after retrospective volume rejection demonstrates new capabilities for robustness to subject motion.

resultsThe proposed method achieved significant acceleration over standard methods, allowing for whole-brain 3D MRE in under 1 min, while maintaining an average 2% difference from traditionally sampled images. If scan time is not prospectively shortened, retrospective removal of images from the data set, such as those corrupted by motion, maintains less than 10% voxel-wise error after removing up to half of a complete data set.

conclusionThrough prospective reduction in sampling, reducing acquisition time, and retrospective volume rejection, this distributed encoding technique adds significant capability and flexibility to MRE acquisitions.

Indexed as

BrainElasticity Imaging TechniquesImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsArtifactsHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMotionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityaccelerationbrainencodingmagnetic resonance elastographymotion robustnesssampling reduction

Identifiers

PMID40638867
PMCPMC12283125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.