ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Fast, motion-robust MR elastography with distributed, generalized encoding.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiecho Fat-Water Spiral MR Elastography With Distributed Encoding for Simultaneously Imaging Brain and Skull Displacement.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Single-Breathhold 3D MR Elastography in the Liver, With Simultaneous R2* and PDFF Mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMR elastography (MRE) data are susceptible to poor quality often caused by long scan times and subject motion, due in part to the specific data sampling requirements for determining motion fields to estimate mechanical properties. By reformulating how motion is encoded and estimated, a more efficient and flexible MRE method that allows for accelerated acquisition and motion robustness is established. THEORY AND
methodsA novel motion-encoding technique was implemented that uses fully distributed sampling directions in an optimized encoding matrix to collect data efficiently. These data are used in an optimization algorithm to estimate harmonic displacement fields. Simulations and in vivo brain MRE data demonstrate the performance of distributed encoding compared with traditional encoding. Estimation of motion from partial data sets after retrospective volume rejection demonstrates new capabilities for robustness to subject motion.
resultsThe proposed method achieved significant acceleration over standard methods, allowing for whole-brain 3D MRE in under 1 min, while maintaining an average 2% difference from traditionally sampled images. If scan time is not prospectively shortened, retrospective removal of images from the data set, such as those corrupted by motion, maintains less than 10% voxel-wise error after removing up to half of a complete data set.
conclusionThrough prospective reduction in sampling, reducing acquisition time, and retrospective volume rejection, this distributed encoding technique adds significant capability and flexibility to MRE acquisitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.