ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Enhancing computation speed and accuracy in deep image prior-based parameter mapping.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing computation speed and accuracy in deep image prior-based parameter mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo make Deep Image Prior (DIP)-based parameter mapping faster, more accurate, and suitable for clinical applications, with added support for multislice and 3D datasets.
methodsDIP leverages the inherent structure of an untrained image generator to address various inverse imaging tasks, including denoising. In this study, we enhance DIP-based denoising for parameter mapping with warm-start across neighboring image slices and different patient subjects. This approach leverages spatial similarity to reduce computation time. Additionally, we introduce an early-stopping criterion that selects the denoising level based on MRI signal noise. We further investigate uncertainty calibration through dropout probability tuning to address issues with miscalibrated uncertainty estimates from Monte Carlo dropout. Furthermore, we explore reducing computation time by tuning learning rates and network complexity.
resultsWe show that reusing image generator weights with warm-start significantly accelerates the denoising of large datasets, reducing computation time by 78% to 95% across various tasks. The early stopping approach proved effective, eliminating the need to manually select the number of optimization steps. Dropout probability tuning helps mitigate the issue of miscalibrated uncertainty, though further refinements are necessary, particularly to achieve better calibration on a per-pixel level. Additionally, tuning learning rates and network complexity provided valuable insights into optimizing the model for different tasks.
conclusionThe proposed developments enable DIP-based parameter mapping to become faster, more accurate, and, consequently, more practical and scalable for clinical applications involving larger datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.