Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638859›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Enhancing computation speed and accuracy in deep image prior-based parameter mapping.

Max Hellström, Polina Kurtser, Tommy Löfstedt, Anders Garpebring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Max HellströmDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-6567
Polina KurtserDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-379X
Tommy LöfstedtDepartment of Computing Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-7646
Anders GarpebringDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0532-232X

Funding

Cancerforskningsfonden i Norrland AMP 18-912Lions Cancerforskningsfond LP 18-2182Lions Cancerforskningsfond LP 22-2319Lions Cancerforskningsfond LP 24-2367Region Västerbotten (Bas ALF) RV-970119The Swedish Research Council 2019-0432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo make Deep Image Prior (DIP)-based parameter mapping faster, more accurate, and suitable for clinical applications, with added support for multislice and 3D datasets.

methodsDIP leverages the inherent structure of an untrained image generator to address various inverse imaging tasks, including denoising. In this study, we enhance DIP-based denoising for parameter mapping with warm-start across neighboring image slices and different patient subjects. This approach leverages spatial similarity to reduce computation time. Additionally, we introduce an early-stopping criterion that selects the denoising level based on MRI signal noise. We further investigate uncertainty calibration through dropout probability tuning to address issues with miscalibrated uncertainty estimates from Monte Carlo dropout. Furthermore, we explore reducing computation time by tuning learning rates and network complexity.

resultsWe show that reusing image generator weights with warm-start significantly accelerates the denoising of large datasets, reducing computation time by 78% to 95% across various tasks. The early stopping approach proved effective, eliminating the need to manually select the number of optimization steps. Dropout probability tuning helps mitigate the issue of miscalibrated uncertainty, though further refinements are necessary, particularly to achieve better calibration on a per-pixel level. Additionally, tuning learning rates and network complexity provided valuable insights into optimizing the model for different tasks.

conclusionThe proposed developments enable DIP-based parameter mapping to become faster, more accurate, and, consequently, more practical and scalable for clinical applications involving larger datasets.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMonte Carlo MethodReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise Ratiodeep image Priordenoisingparameter mappingquantitative MRIuncertainty estimation

Identifiers

PMID40638859
PMCPMC12501688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.