Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638846›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2025

A systematic review of health economic evaluation quality assessment instruments for medical devices.

Ilke Akpinar, Ali Unsal, Mike Paulden, Jeff Round

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilke AkpinarCollege of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-5095
Ali UnsalInstitute of Health Economics, Industry Partnership, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mike PauldenCollege of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jeff RoundFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Pediatrics Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-6984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealth economic evaluations are important for healthcare resource allocation. Reviews of health economic evaluations for medical devices have highlighted concerns about the quality of these studies. The complexity of medical devices, including learning curve effects, organizational impact, dynamic pricing, low evidence, and incremental innovation presents unique challenges compared with pharmaceuticals. To support developing a methodological quality assessment instrument for medical device economic evaluations, we conducted a systematic review to identify and evaluate existing economic evaluation quality assessment instruments for suitability in medical device evaluations.

methodsA comprehensive search of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, CINAHL, and Web of Science) and grey literature was conducted. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts. Full-text, peer-reviewed primary studies introducing original instruments were included. Only methodological quality assessment instruments were considered for data extraction. Each item was assessed for its suitability in evaluating medical device economic evaluations and inclusion of medical device-specific features.

resultsThe search identified 4203 citations and 77 grey literature sources. Fifteen results underwent full-text assessment, with five relevant instruments identified. A previous systematic review identified 10 additional instruments, which we also considered. Of these 25 articles, 13 were included in the review. These instruments lack specificity for medical devices, particularly in addressing features like learning curve effects, organizational impact, and incremental innovation. Instruments should include items specific to these unique characteristics.

conclusionsExisting instruments contain general items related to health economic evaluation studies, highlighting the need for an instrument specifically tailored to evaluate the methodological quality of medical device economic evaluation studies.

Indexed as

Equipment and SuppliesTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalCost-Benefit AnalysisHumanschecklisteconomic evaluationmedical devicemethodological qualityquality assessment

Identifiers

PMID40638846
PMCPMC12257040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.