ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Re-evaluating the phylogenetic relationships of zosterophylls with a comprehensively sampled dataset and a combination of traditional and new alternative methods.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe known diversity of zosterophylls, the dominant tracheophytes at the beginning of the Devonian, has expanded significantly due to discoveries that intervened since the latest large phylogenetic treatment targeting the group, almost 30 years ago. Past phylogenetic treatments reached incomplete resolution or conflicting results on relationships among zosterophylls and between zosterophylls and lycopsids (which are traditionally thought to have evolved from among zosterophylls). This state of knowledge emphasizes the need for re-evaluation of zosterophyll relationships. Here, we address the phylogenetic relationships of zosterophylls based on the most extensive taxonomic sampling of the group and explore the evolutionary implications of the results.
methodsWe assembled and analysed a data matrix of 44 taxa (38 of them zosterophylls) and 42 morphological characters using parsimony and Bayesian approaches. We evaluated the resulting topologies using a new approach aimed at reconciling phylogenetic conflict and identifying shared patterns of relationships, alongside traditional stratigraphic fit tests and ancestral character state reconstruction. KEY
resultsWithin the Lycophytina clade, zosterophylls form a grade paraphyletic to the lycopsids. A Sawdoniaceae clade of zosterophylls is sister to the lycopsids; the Sawdoniaceae-lycopsids clade is sister to a clade that includes the barinophytes.
conclusionsA major radiation before and during the late Silurian gave rise to the main zosterophyll lineages (including lycopsids) and led to diversification within each of these lineages. Cladogenesis continued through the Lochkovian and relented in the Pragian, with virtually no diversification afterwards. Lycophytes (Lycophytina) are ancestrally defined by bivalvate sporangia opening along their distal margin, attached laterally on axes. Lycophytina comprises two clades: one characterized by irregularly distributed sporangia and the other (including the majority of zosterophylls, along with lycopsids and barinophytes) characterized by reniform sporangia arranged in rows, 3-D branching architectures and K-/H-branching in the rhizomatous portions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.