ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Nursing supervision in the mobile pre-hospital emergency care service.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze limitations and potentialities of nursing supervision, according to the nursing team, of a Mobile Emergency Care Service.
methodDescriptive research, with a qualitative approach, using the Critical Incident Technique. Nurses and nursing technicians participated. Data were collected in a semi-structured, individual, recorded interview, later transcribed, followed by the grouping and categorization of Critical Incidents, using Bardin's content analysis.
resultsSeventy-seven critical incidents emerged from the interviews, 22% received positive and 78% negative references, indicating a predominance of factors that limit supervision. These factors were categorized into "Singularities of nursing supervision", "Organizational conditions", "People management", and "Vacancy regulation".
conclusionEnhancing factors: institutional support, education as a supervision tool, team meetings, timely feedback and participatory management; limiting factors: indirect nursing supervision (nurse and technicians in different teams), lack of materials and maintenance and of institutional support, nurse work overload, conflicts, and lack of communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.