Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638683›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Improving meningitis surveillance and diagnosis with machine learning: Insights from São Paulo.

Audêncio Victor, Diego Augusto Medeiros Santos, Eduardo Koerich Nery, Danilo Pereira Mori, Pamella Cristina de Carvalho Lucas, Denise Cammarota, Guillermo Leonardo Florez Montero, Fabiano Novaes Barcellos Filho, Ana Lúcia Frugis Yu, Telma Regina Marques Pinto Carvalhanas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An explainable machine learning model predicts pediatric varicella encephalitis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Audêncio VictorSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-3639
Diego Augusto Medeiros SantosSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5250-9453
Eduardo Koerich NerySão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.
Danilo Pereira MoriSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pamella Cristina de Carvalho LucasSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.
Denise CammarotaSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guillermo Leonardo Florez MonteroSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6617-4095
Fabiano Novaes Barcellos FilhoPublic Health Postgraduate Program, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Lúcia Frugis YuSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.
Telma Regina Marques Pinto CarvalhanasSão Paulo State Health Department, Disease Control Coordination, Epidemiological Surveillance Center "Prof. Alexandre Vranjac," Respiratory Disease Division, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMeningitis, an inflammatory condition of the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord, can be caused by various agents. Bacterial meningitis is particularly severe due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. This study aims to develop machine learning (ML) models to classify the aetiology of bacterial meningitis using data from the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN) in São Paulo State, Brazil.

methodsData were collected from the SINAN database, including sociodemographic variables, clinical symptoms, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses. Five ML models Random Forest, LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, and AdaBoost were applied to classify meningitis cases into bacterial, fungal, viral, and other types. Models were evaluated using metrics such as AUC-ROC, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and MCC.

resultsThe CatBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.95 for binary classification (bacterial vs. non-bacterial) and 0.85 for multiclass classification (Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae). XGBoost and LightGBM also showed promising results with AUC-ROC scores of 0.94 and 0.92, respectively, for binary classification. The CatBoost model exhibited high sensitivity and reasonable specificity, highlighting its applicability in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of meningitis. SHAP analysis identified variables such as leukocyte count and the presence of petechiae as influential predictors in the models.

conclusionML algorithms, particularly CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM, proved highly effective in the differential diagnosis of meningitis, offering a valuable tool for the rapid identification of meningitis types and bacterial serogroups. These techniques can be integrated into public health protocols to improve meningitis outbreak responses and optimize patient treatment.

Identifiers

PMID40638683
PMCPMC12244477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.