Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638674›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Penalty or premium for foreign ownership in Thailand? Comparing public support for waste-to-energy plants operated by Thai, Japanese, and Chinese Companies.

Azusa Uji, Jaehyun Song, Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Azusa UjiGraduate School of Law, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9992-5908
Jaehyun SongFaculty of Informatics, Kansai University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-6505
Nives DolšakSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8325-3155
Aseem PrakashDepartment of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7364-0135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste-to-energy (WtE) projects use municipal waste to generate energy. While they increase local environmental and health risks, they also generate local environmental and economic benefits. If facility operator characteristics influence perceptions of risks and benefits, does public support for a WtE facility change if it is operated by a foreign firm? Using a survey experiment in Thailand (n = 829), we examine support for a hypothetical WtE plant operated by local Thai (reference category), Japanese (treatment 1), and Chinese (treatment 2) firms. We find that while respondents are less supportive of WtE plants operated by Chinese companies ("penalty for foreignness"), their support does not change for Japanese plants (neither penalty nor premium for foreignness). Importantly, while perceptions of local economic benefits increase support, perceptions of environmental benefits from reducing waste and landfills do not. Respondents support WtE plants when their communities experience air pollution from coal-fired power plants and when they support the Thai government's decision to ban the manufacturing and sale of single-use plastics.

Indexed as

OwnershipPower PlantsPublic OpinionWaste ManagementChinaHumansJapanSurveys and QuestionnairesThailand

Identifiers

PMID40638674
PMCPMC12244724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.