Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638668›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Monitoring cognitive resilience in military personnel in extreme operational environments: The role of smart technologies and nutritional strategies-A scoping review protocol.

Rodica Siminiuc, Dinu Turcanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rodica SiminiucDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Technical University of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4257-1840
Dinu TurcanuDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Technical University of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-4246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMaintaining cognitive performance in extreme operational environments is essential for military personnel efficiency. Exposure to multiple stressors, including sleep deprivation, intense physical exertion, and limited access to food resources, can affect cognitive function and decision-making ability. Although studies on military nutrition and smart technologies exist, an integrated synthesis that analyzes their interactions is currently lacking. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis scoping review follows the JBI methodology, with a structured study selection and data synthesis process. The analysis includes international databases and grey literature, with results presented both narratively and in tabular form.

objectivesThis scoping review aims to map and analyze the literature on smart technologies used for monitoring the cognitive resilience of military personnel deployed in extreme operational environments, as well as the role of nutritional strategies in supporting cognitive resilience, following the PCC criteria. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies published after 2000 that investigated nutritional strategies and the use of smart technologies to monitor or support the cognitive resilience of military personnel will be included. Research focusing solely on physical performance or pharmacological interventions unrelated to operational nutrition was excluded. REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol was registered in the OSF (Open Science Framework): [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EC7MG].

Indexed as

CognitionMilitary PersonnelResilience, PsychologicalHumansScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40638668
PMCPMC12244529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.