ArticlePloS one2025
Optimization of cryoprotectants and storage temperatures for preserving viability and probiotic properties of lyophilized bacterial strains from chicken gut.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Probiotic Performance in Food Matrices: From Strain Selection to Bioengineering.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Probiotics in Poultry: From Conventional Strains to Engineered and Synbiotic Approaches.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles as therapeutic agents for retinal ganglion cell degeneration: current challenges and future prospects.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Probiotic Potential of Traditional and Emerging Microbial Strains in Functional Foods: From Characterization to Applications and Health Benefits.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics, particularly strains from the genera Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and Staphylococcus, play a vital role in gut health, immune modulation, and pathogen inhibition. However, environmental stressors during storage often compromise their long-term viability and probiotic functionality. By examining how lyophilization affects the viability and probiotic functionality of certain strains of Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and Staphylococcus, this study sought to understand how storage conditions and protective agents affect bacterial survival and important probiotic characteristics. The bacterial strains were isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of native chickens, cultivated in MRS broth, subjected to freeze-drying with different cryoprotectant formulations, and stored at varying temperatures (4°C, -20°C, and -80°C) for up to 12 months. Survival rates, stress resistance under simulated gastric and intestinal conditions, and probiotic functionality were evaluated over time. The results demonstrated that ultra-low temperature storage (-80°C) combined with a formulation of 5% glucose, 5% sucrose, 7% skim milk powder, and 2% glycine provided optimal protection. This combination effectively reduced oxidative and gastrointestinal stress and preserved key probiotic traits, including adhesion potential, antimicrobial activity, and metabolic stability. Conversely, strains stored without cryoprotectants or at higher temperatures exhibited significant viability loss and functional decline. The study highlights the critical role of optimized cryoprotection in maintaining probiotic efficacy during long-term storage. Our findings reinforce the necessity of selecting appropriate excipients and storage conditions to sustain probiotic efficacy, providing valuable insights for the development of stable, high-quality probiotic formulations. Future research should explore strain-specific responses to lyophilization and alternative preservation strategies to improve probiotic stability and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.