ArticlePloS one2025
Preparation of high-flowability ultra-early-strength grouting material and investigation of its mechanical properties in reinforcing fractured sandstone.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically investigated the effects of modified ultrafine fly ash, ultrafine silica fume, nano-SiO2, and polycarboxylate superplasticizer on the performance of cement-based grouting materials. Using a five-level orthogonal experimental, the optimal mix ratio was determined: 5.00 wt.% modified ultrafine fly ash, 10.00 wt.% ultrafine silica fume, 9.00 wt.% nano-SiO2, and 0.05 wt.% polycarboxylate superplasticizer. This formulation enabled the preparation of a cement-based grouting material with high-flowability and ultra-early-strength (HFUES) characteristics. Experimental results demonstrated that, compared to ordinary silicate grouting materials, the HFUES grouting material significantly enhanced the reinforcement of fractured sandstone. The reinforced specimens exhibited an average 67.42% increment in tensile strength, 123.17% increment in the uniaxial compressive strength, and 94.00% increment in elastic modulus compared to intact specimens. Microstructural analysis revealed that the grouting material was uniformly distributed within the sandstone matrix, forming a dense interfacial bond and generating a substantial amount of fibrous network-like hydration products. The volume fraction of the consolidated matrix was 1.33-1.47 times that of ordinary silicate grouting materials, while the fracture volume fraction was only 0.36-0.73 times. The study demonstrates that the HFUES grouting material exhibits excellent mechanical properties and interfacial bonding characteristics, significantly improving the reinforcement effectiveness of fractured sandstone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.