SynthesisPloS one2025
Social influences in the experience of transition to or from long-term (chronic) pain: A systematic review of qualitative research studies.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Everyday social contexts influence fluctuations into and out of chronic pain: an ethnographic study in England.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, around 30% of people live with long-term ('chronic') pain, with known impact on wellbeing, economic and social lives. Despite increasing attention to contextual and psychosocial aspects of pain, there remains need to understand interrelationships between social phenomena and pain, particularly how social phenomena relate to transitions into and out of chronic pain.
objectivesThis study aimed to understand how pain experiences relate to social phenomena. We conducted a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies that explored social aspects of adults' experience of chronic pain relating to any condition. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies using empirical qualitative methods, focused on adult experiences of chronic pain, and published after 1979. DATA SOURCES: Eight electronic databases were searched from 1979 to February 2025: EMBASE; PsycINFO; PubMed; CINAHL; Business Source Complete; Web of Science (including Social Sciences Citation Index); Scopus; Sociological Abstracts.
methodThe review used a thematic synthesis approach. Searches identified relevant qualitative studies; quality assessment were undertaken using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative studies checklist. Material from relevant literature was extracted, coded and thematically grouped. Double processes were undertaken for rigour.
resultsAnalysis of 71 articles, relating to experience of 1,291 people, enabled development of three themes relating to social phenomena and pain: (1) Social connections with family friends and wider community; (2) Lifestyle, including household tasks, eating, sleep and participation in social activities; (3) Occupation, workplace relationships and related financial disadvantage. Although elucidating the importance of social worlds, the literature included in the review paid scant attention to transitions to and from chronic pain or any mechanisms that might support such transitions.
conclusionThe review suggests that social phenomena influence people's experience of living with chronic pain in important ways. However, little research has explored how and why these social phenomena combine with and influence of transitions to and from pain. These insights could inform development of interventions, education and training to support care for people with chronic pain. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022337979.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.