ArticlePloS one2025
LSTM-based prediction method for shape error of steel truss during incremental launching construction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate shape control during steel truss incremental launching remains a persistent challenge in bridge engineering, primarily due to dynamic geometric variations induced by continuous spatial translation. Conventional measurement-based approaches often lead to inaccurate error determination and insufficient control criteria due to continuous geometric variations during structural movement. This study presents a novel Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based methodology for real-time prediction and adaptive control of shape errors in launching processes. First, an error matrix is established based on the actual pushing measurement plan, and numerous error splines are generated using virtual assembly technology. These splines are output as an error matrix and encoded into a machine-readable format, leading to the establishment of a sliding window method for recursive prediction and updates of the predictions (measured values). Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. Field experiments demonstrate that the predicted values from the LSTM model closely align with the measured values, maintaining short-term shape error prediction accuracy within 3 mm. However, prediction accuracy diminishes for longer time steps as the step length increases. Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.