Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638604›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2026

The modified Borg cycle strength test (mBCST): Feasibility and physiological response in people with COPD and healthy older adults.

Jana De Brandt, Johan Jakobsson, Mattias Hedlund, Thomas Sandström, André Nyberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jana De BrandtDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3463-1911
Johan JakobssonDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-194X
Mattias HedlundDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3844-9247
Thomas SandströmLung and Allergy Clinic, Norrlands Universitetssjukhus, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0174-0882
André NybergDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-7959

Funding

grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2020-01296)Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation #20200139Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (#20200139 and #20210146)Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation #20210146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prescription of supramaximal exercise requires exercise tests covering the intensity domain between maximal aerobic and peak power output. All-out tests are commonly used for this objective but are considered challenging for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to the extreme physiological demand. The modified Borg cycle strength test (mBCST), previously used in older adults to achieve supramaximal intensities, might be a suitable alternative in people with COPD. We aimed to determine the feasibility of the mBCST in people with COPD and to compare the physiological response with that of healthy older adults. Eighteen people with COPD and 16 age-, sex- and physical activity-matched healthy adults performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test and a mBCST. The mBCST is an incremental test [30 s:30 s cycling:rest; with individualized starting load and step size (15-50 W)] with end-of-test criteria of a rating of perceived exertion of ≥17 or cadence of <75 RPM for >5 s. Feasibility was assessed using a framework covering the aim, interpretability, familiarity, duration, scoring/completion complexity, costs and safety. Measurements of external exercise intensity, rating of perceived exertion, symptoms and cardiorespiratory demand were obtained. The mBCST was deemed feasible according to the feasibility framework. Expressed relative to the cardiopulmonary exercise test, the participants reached supramaximal external exercise intensities during the mBCST [COPD, 145 (125-168)%; healthy, 154 (148-163)%], without differences in intensity or physiological response between groups (p > 0.05). The mBCST is feasible in people with COPD and enables supramaximal external exercise intensities, with similar physiological response to healthy older adults. The mBCST could be considered when selecting an exercise test to prescribe supramaximal exercise.

Indexed as

Exercise TestMuscle StrengthPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedExerciseExercise ToleranceFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionPhysical Exertionchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseexercise prescriptionexercise testhigh‐intensity interval training

Identifiers

PMID40638604
PMCPMC13238777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.