ArticlePloS one2025
Word recognition during movement under simulated weather conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- You Can Stand Under My Umbrella: Cognitive Load in Second-Language Reading.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Processing linguistic materials while driving is essential for ensuring road safety; however, adverse weather conditions can compromise our ability to read at ease. Here we rely on Virtual Reality (VR) to recreate real-world perceptual disfluency, allowing us to investigate the effects of differing weather scenarios-such as sunny and rainy-on word recognition while in movement. Participants navigated a realistic VR driving environment and performed a word identification and naming task, with linguistic materials displayed on road signs encountered along the route. Results showed that high-frequency words were recognized better than low-frequency counterparts, reaffirming the strength of the frequency effect, even under dynamic situations. Additionally, reaction times were slower in rainy compared to sunny conditions, indicating that adverse weather impairs processing speed but not overall recognition accuracy. The negative effect of rain also increased progressively over time, suggesting a potential accumulation of perceptual fatigue or diminished visual adaptation. The lack of a significant interaction between the weather conditions and word frequency suggests that these effects were independent, with no significant interaction between frequency and weather condition. These findings demonstrate the utility of VR as an ecologically valid framework to investigate the complex interplay between environmental context and reading comprehension. In conclusion, the current study provides insights into how varying environmental conditions affect word recognition during movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.