Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Word recognition during movement under simulated weather conditions.

Francisco Rocabado, Natasha Alonso-Bernal, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francisco RocabadoCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Department of Education, Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4845-6950
Natasha Alonso-BernalCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Department of Education, Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.
Jon Andoni DuñabeitiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Department of Education, Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-8559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing linguistic materials while driving is essential for ensuring road safety; however, adverse weather conditions can compromise our ability to read at ease. Here we rely on Virtual Reality (VR) to recreate real-world perceptual disfluency, allowing us to investigate the effects of differing weather scenarios-such as sunny and rainy-on word recognition while in movement. Participants navigated a realistic VR driving environment and performed a word identification and naming task, with linguistic materials displayed on road signs encountered along the route. Results showed that high-frequency words were recognized better than low-frequency counterparts, reaffirming the strength of the frequency effect, even under dynamic situations. Additionally, reaction times were slower in rainy compared to sunny conditions, indicating that adverse weather impairs processing speed but not overall recognition accuracy. The negative effect of rain also increased progressively over time, suggesting a potential accumulation of perceptual fatigue or diminished visual adaptation. The lack of a significant interaction between the weather conditions and word frequency suggests that these effects were independent, with no significant interaction between frequency and weather condition. These findings demonstrate the utility of VR as an ecologically valid framework to investigate the complex interplay between environmental context and reading comprehension. In conclusion, the current study provides insights into how varying environmental conditions affect word recognition during movement.

Indexed as

Recognition, PsychologyWeatherAdultAutomobile DrivingFemaleHumansMaleMovementReaction TimeReadingVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40638584
PMCPMC12244536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.