ArticlePloS one2025
Interfered feature elimination coupled with feature group selection for wound infection detection by electronic nose.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the precise odor-sensing equipment, the electronic nose integrates multiple advanced and sensitive sensors that can identify wound infections non-invasively and rapidly by analyzing wound characteristic odor. To reduce the cost of sensors and improve or maintain e-nose's performance, efficient optimization of sensor arrays is required. For this issue, we proposed a new sensor array optimization algorithm named Interfered Feature Elimination coupled with Feature Group Selection (IFE-FGS). In this method, the IFE algorithm first removed the bad sensor features; then the FGS algorithm determined the optimized sensor combination by gradually selecting the features in groups. The experimental results show the superiority of the IFE- FGS method on two bacteria datasets and six public gene expression profiling datasets. IFE- FGS achieves the classification accuracy of 93.95% and 94.94% in mean accuracy and max accuracy, respectively, on the bacteria dataset 2, which is significantly ahead of the comparison methods. Besides, our proposed method shows consistency and effectiveness. It achieves excellent performance, which takes two first-places, four second-places in mean accuracy, one first-place, and six second-places in max accuracy. Moreover, it also explores three novel and valuable discoveries for the electronic nose: 1) It can effectively identify biomarkers in the application. 2) It can effectively distinguish the degree of chemical components contributing to odors. 3) It can reveal the effective detection range of the targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.