ArticlePloS one2025
Qualitative process evaluation of a new short-hospital-stay model with a general medicine focus in Germany (STATAMED): Study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing number of elderly and multimorbid patients in need of care, coupled with a shortage of skilled health care professionals, poses significant challenges, especially in structurally underserved regions. STATAMED (funded by the G-BA Innovation Fund, 01NVF22103) represents a novel cross-sector care model emphasising short hospital stays with a general medicine focus for patients with (sub-)acute treatment needs. The intervention provides targeted, short-term inpatient care within STATAMED units, followed by rapid discharge and subsequent follow-up care in familiar environments. Key objectives include reduced emergency department visits, hospital stays and re-admissions, as well as the provision of needs-oriented health care. The broader evaluation comprises multiple quantitative and qualitative sub-studies. The present sub-study involves a qualitative process evaluation investigating the factors influencing acceptance, the degree of implementation and the impact on daily workflows and care structures at STATAMED sites.
methodsThe sub-study will employ a combination of qualitative health services research methods (i.e., focus group discussions, individual interviews, participatory observations, discussion and information forums) to capture the perspectives and experiences of three main stakeholder groups: (1) patients and their relatives, (2) health care providers and (3) the general population. Data collected through protocols and transcripts will undergo qualitative content analysis to identify recurring themes and insights. DISCUSSION: This sub-study seeks to elucidate the expectations, attitudes and needs of stakeholders, while assessing overall acceptance of the STATAMED model. Additionally, it aims to identify both facilitators and barriers to implementation, as well as the implications for work processes, collaboration and communication within daily care. The findings will inform strategies to optimise implementation, ensuring a successful transition to routine care. Given the political and public sensitivity surrounding health care system redesigns, particularly in rural areas, diverse stakeholder perspectives are incorporated.
trial registrationThe study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; DRKS00033801; date of registration: 22 March 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.