ArticlePloS one2025
Port terminal mobile recognition based on combined YOLOv5s-DeepSort.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To solve the problem of reduced positioning accuracy caused by changes in scale, background and occlusion in port and dock video images, this research proposes an enhanced model combining YOLOv5s-DeepSORT, integrating target load recognition and trajectory tracking to improve adaptability to dock environments. The findings indicate that incorporating multi-scale convolution into YOLOv5s improved the robustness of multi-scale object detection, resulting in a 0.4% increase in mean Average Precision (mAP). Furthermore, the integration of an efficient pyramid segmentation attention (EPSA) network enhanced the accuracy of multi-scale feature fusion representation. The model's mAP@0.5:0.95 increased by 1.2% following the introduction of EPSA. Finally, the original classification loss function was enhanced using a distributed sorting loss approach to mitigate the imbalance among loaded objects and the influence of background variations in the dock image sequence. This optimization led to a 3.1% improvement in multi-target tracking accuracy (MOTA). Experimental results on self-constructed datasets demonstrated an average accuracy of 90.9% and a detection accuracy of 92.2%, offering a valuable reference for target recognition and tracking in port and dock environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.