Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638538›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025

More Timely Response to Outbreaks of Zoonotic Compared to Non-Zoonotic Diseases in Animals in Tanzania.

Esron Karimuribo, Veronica Masawe, Lars Eik Olav, Doreen Ndossi, Ann-Katrin Llarena, Calvin Sindato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esron KarimuriboCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-5517-1769
Veronica MasaweCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID 0009-0000-3322-6135
Lars Eik OlavDepartment of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, ÅS, Norway.
Doreen NdossiCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Ann-Katrin LlarenaFood Safety Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Calvin SindatoSACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.

Funding

Ending Pandemics for financial support # TC2109-101853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timeliness metrics analysis is a useful approach for tracking speed in actions and identifying gaps during disease outbreaks. There is limited information on the time taken for preventing, controlling and containing disease outbreaks in human and animal populations in Tanzania. We conducted timeliness metrics analysis on zoonotic and non-zoonotic disease outbreaks which occurred between May 2019 and April 2023 in 10 selected districts within four regions located in the Northern (Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions) and Southern Highlands zones (Mbeya and Songwe regions) of Tanzania. Field-based outbreak milestones for selected zoonotic diseases, namely rabies and anthrax and non-zoonotic diseases, African swine fever (ASF), contagious caprine pleuropneumonia and Peste des petits ruminants, were recorded. Modified metrics for One Health Surveillance were employed to estimate the time used for disease outbreak detection, notification, verification, risk assessment, laboratory confirmation, inter-sectoral sharing of information (for zoonotic diseases only), response and public communication. A total of 98 disease outbreaks, of which 63 were zoonotic (64.3%) and 35 were non-zoonotic (35.7%), were recorded. These outbreaks were distributed across the Northern (68/98) and Southern Highlands (30/98) zones. The time taken to detect zoonotic disease outbreaks was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken to detect non-zoonotic disease outbreaks (median = 3 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0485). Furthermore, the time taken to detect disease outbreaks in the Northern zone was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken in the Southern Highlands zone (median = 7 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0010). Variation between geographical locations was observed where in the Northern zone, a shorter time was taken to verify (median = 1 day, range = 1-14 days) and to respond (median = 1 day, range = 1-30 days) to disease outbreaks than in the Southern Highlands (verification time: median = 3 days, range = 1-30 days and response time: median = 30 days, range = 1-60 days). Such differences could be due to resource disparities in the two zones and shorter distance to access diagnostic facilities in the Northern zone. This is the first field-based timeliness metrics analysis study carried out in Tanzania. Findings of this study may be utilised to guide animal and public health interventions for effective and efficient surveillance and control of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. It is recommended that more investment is carried out in emergency preparedness for the timely management of zoonotic and non-zoonotic diseases in Tanzania.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksZoonosesAnimalsTanzaniaTime Factorsdisease outbreaksone HealthTanzaniatimeliness metrics

Identifiers

PMID40638538
PMCPMC12244262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.