ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
Prospective clinical cohort study on the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging for cancer of the rectum with node-by-node analysis by pathologists.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of tailgut cysts via three-dimensional-modeled Kraske procedure.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMultidisciplinary treatment is the standard of care for patients with cancer of the rectum. Neoadjuvant therapy decisions rely on the local carcinoma stage's magnetic resonance imaging assessment. However, the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating mesorectal lymphadenopathy remains highly questionable.
methodsA prospective clinical study was conducted to assess the accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in assessing T-stage and N-stage rectal carcinoma. The magnetic resonance imaging findings were compared with those of a detailed histopathological examination of rectal specimens in each patient.
resultsThe study included 48 patients with cancer of the rectum who had undergone rectal resection with total mesorectal excision. The magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the T-stage was accurate in 26 out of the 48 cases (54.2%). Overstaging of the T-stage was recognized in 18 patients (37.5%), and 4 (8.3%) were understaged. According to preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (using Horvat's criteria), 56 suspicious/malignant lymph nodes were identified. However, only 13 (23.2%) of these lymph nodes were proved malignant on histopathology examination. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for nodal involvement assessment was 52.0% and specificity was 93.6%. Of the 646 magnetic resonance imaging-negative lymph nodes, 12 (1.9%) were false negatives (histopathology revealed metastatic lymph nodes). Of note, 20 study patients with malignant lymphadenopathy (according to magnetic resonance imaging) were detected. The magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of malignant lymphadenopathy was correct in only 30.0% of these patients.
conclusionThe accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating mesorectal lymph nodes for cases with cancer of the rectum is remarkably low. Therefore, neoadjuvant therapy indications should be based primarily on the magnetic resonance imaging description of the depth of carcinoma invasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.