ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Validation of the logical model of comprehensive care for children with congenital Zika syndrome].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a logical model of the components of comprehensive care for children with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in three stages: (1) search in the scientific literature and official documents to elaborate the logical model, (2) improvement of the model by incorporating the suggestions of specialists in child health, people with disabilities, health evaluation, and health care network, and (3) validation of the logical model by the Delphi consensus in two phases: evaluation of the relevance of the model items by the percentage of agreement (PA), Cronbach's alpha coefficient, medians, and interquartile values. The logical model contains all the necessary components to admit and follow up CZS cases from conception to the third year of life. A total of 136 items of the model were classified as relevant (phase 1: PA 96-97% and 0.76-0.93; phase 2: PA 98% and 0.88-0.97), 98% very relevant and 2% relevant. The elaboration and validation of the logical model could graphically represent the components necessary for comprehensive health care for children with CZS and organize care flows with the necessary elements to assist local management in planning, structuring, and evaluating the health care network. Despite the unique characteristics of the municipality, this model may serve other locations with contextual factors resembling those in Rio de Janeiro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.