ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Associations between enamel defects and caries in patients with Down syndrome compared with normotypic patients.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel (DDE) and dental caries in children with and without Down syndrome (DS) and evaluate potential associations between these conditions. This was a cross-sectional, exploratory, census-based study with children of both sexes aged 6 to 11 years. The sample consisted of 10 children diagnosed with DS and 61 without DS. Standardized forms and records of dmft/DMFT and modified developmental defects of enamel (mDDE) were used. Inter- and intraexaminer agreement was assessed, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.93 for DDE and 0.81 for caries. The data were tabulated using SPSS 20.0. Categorical variables were subjected to Pearson's chi-square test to identify significant associations (p = 0.05). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test revealed a nonnormal distribution pattern of the data (p <0.001). Therefore, numerical variables were subjected to the Mann-Whitney test to verify statistically significant differences (p = 0.05). Among the 71 study participants, 43 (60.6%) were male, and 28 (39.4%) were female. Among them, 10 (14.1%) had DS, 42 (59.2%) had caries, and 19 (26.8%) had DDE, with demarcated opacity as the most common type of DDE. A significant association was identified between having DS and not having dental caries (p = 0.007) and between having DS and having DDE (p <0.001). Individuals with DS were found to have 9.8 times greater odds of having DDE (p = 0.018). Compared with normotypic children, children with DS had a greater prevalence of DDE and a lower prevalence of dental caries. Additionally, children without DS were more likely to have caries in the presence of DDE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.