ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Influence of luting space settings and polymerization-induced cement shrinkage and deformation/adaptation of CAD/CAM crowns.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the adaptation of CAD/CAM crowns and the impact of resin cement polymerization contraction on crown deformation under different cementation configurations. Thirty human molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10) to manufacture ceramic crowns with three different cementation space configurations: LD40 (40 μm), LD80 (80 μm), and LD160 (160 μm). The samples were subjected to computerized microtomography scanning for measuring internal and marginal adaptation, and internal fit was analyzed at occlusal, axial, axiogingival points. Five light-curing protocols were used to verify the wavelength spectrum peak of the curing device and the irradiance delivered using two situations: with 0 mm sensor distance and through a ceramic of differing thickness, and an external crown deformation (ECD) test. The highest statistically significant vertical fit was obtained for group LD40, independent of region. LD160 yielded the highest ECD values, independent of positioning of the buccal and distal strain gauge. The highest internal fit was observed at occlusal and axial points of the LD160 group (P<0.001), and LD80 yielded the lowest values at the axiogingival point (p = 0.003, p = 0.006). The irradiance delivered was reduced significantly upon interposition of the ceramic block to the sensor. The peak wavelength for curing was similar among the LD groups. The luting space configurations significantly influenced vertical fit and the ECD results for the CAD/CAM ceramics owing to polymerization shrinkage. Finally, variations in ceramic thickness at different sites affected both the irradiance by the curing device and ECD results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.