ArticleThe oncologist2025
Immuno-oncologyDupilumab for bullous pemphigoid related to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective case series.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- An atypical presentation of Pembrolizumab-induced bullous pemphigoid in a patient with uterine serous carcinoma.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of biologic therapies in immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Induced Bullous Pemphigoid: A Spanish Multicentric Case Series.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Observational
- A case series of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid successfully treated with dupilumab and evidence for the BP180 midportion epitope as a preferential autoantigenic target.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Dupilumab Can Be Effective for Immune-Related Adverse Event Dermatitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Severe systemic cutaneous adverse reactions following camrelizumab therapy: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but are associated with treatment-limiting immune-related cutaneous adverse events (irCAEs). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related bullous pemphigoid (irBP), a severe, blistering irCAE occurs in 0.3%-1.5% of patients receiving ICI therapy. While systemic steroids can be effective, they are associated with significant toxicity and may mitigate -immunotherapy antitumor efficacy. Consequently, steroid-sparing therapies are needed. Dupilumab, an IL-4 and IL-13 receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in non-ICI-related BP and appears promising for managing irBP.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with dupilumab for irBP from April 2020 to April 2024. Clinical data, outcomes, and adverse events were assessed. Inhibitor-related bullous pemphigoid response was categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or no response (NR).
resultsIn all, 17 patients (59% male, 82% non-Hispanic White; mean age 72.7 years) developed irBP while receiving PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors. Sixteen patients (94%) received dupilumab for active irBP and one (6%) for prevention of recurrence. Dupilumab achieved CR of irBP for 12 patients (75%) and PR for 2 (12%) patients with active irBP. Ten (62%) achieved CR with dupilumab systemic monotherapy. Median time to first response was 19.5 days (range = 3-50). Most patients with CR (58%) failed prior oral corticosteroid therapy. The patient treated prophylactically experienced no irBP recurrence. Dupilumab was well-tolerated, with no adverse events.
conclusionsDupilumab is a promising steroid-sparing option for irBP, achieving initial response in under 20 days for most cases. Dupilumab is a valuable tool to manage this challenging irCAE while minimizing risk related to systemic steroid treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.