Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638117›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Systemic Strategies to Prevent Nonbeneficial Treatments Near the End of Life.

Sofia Weiss Goitiandia, Amy Z Sun, Amy Rosenwohl-Mack, Catthi Ly, Katherine E Sleeman, Daniel Dohan, Elizabeth Dzeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sofia Weiss GoitiandiaDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Amy Z SunDepartment of Geriatrics and Extended Care, Division of Palliative and Hospice Care, Tibor Rubin VA Medical Center, Long Beach, California.
Amy Rosenwohl-MackPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
Catthi LyDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Katherine E SleemanCicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel DohanPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
Elizabeth DzengDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

Identifying contributing factors to burdensome ICU treatments in older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the United States and United KingdomR03AG060098 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DZENG, ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2019
$240k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG060098NIH HHS K07 AG006681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There exists a default toward high-intensity treatments near the end of life in the United States, including for people living with advanced dementia (PLWD). Clinical momentum, a cascade of increasingly intensive treatments facilitated by systemic factors, contributes to this default. The intensity of treatments provided to PLWD near the end of life is lower in Great Britain. Using Great Britain as a counterexample to the United States, this study examines factors that may contribute to lower-intensity treatment patterns. Objective: To understand factors within the British health care system that shape treatment intensity for PLWD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used semistructured, in-depth interviews with clinicians at 1 National Health Service (NHS) trust in South London and with caregivers of PLWD in England and Wales. Interviews were conducted between February 2021 and February 2023. Perspectives on factors influencing treatment escalation decisions in PLWD were elicited. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the individual-, institutional-, and system-level factors that affect treatment escalation decisions among PLWD in Great Britain. Results: A total of 13 clinicians (11 [84.6%] women; 3 [23.1%] Asian or Asian British, 1 [7.7%] Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African, and 9 [69.2%] White; median [range] years in practice, 26 [8-35]) and 14 caregivers (8 [57.1%] women; 3 [21.4%] Asian or Asian British, 2 [14.3%] Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African, and 8 [57.1%] White; median [IQR] age among 13 who provided data, 32 [28-45] years) participated. Caregiver respondents discussed individual-level factors preventing escalation to high-intensity treatments (transparent communication and knowledge of dementia trajectory). Clinician and caregiver respondents described institutional-level factors (eg, protocols, resources, and practices) and system-level factors (eg, national policies, laws, and cultural norms) shaping treatment escalation decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of clinicians and caregivers in Great Britain, respondents reported individual-, institutional-, and system-level factors that they perceived to both independently and collectively prevent potentially nonbeneficial treatment escalation, including to life-sustaining treatments, and facilitate deescalation in PLWD. These factors created structured opportunities for clinicians and caregivers to deliberate on decisions to escalate treatment intensity. The convergence of these factors generated a clinical practice pattern minimizing escalation toward high-intensity treatments in PLWD, referred to here as clinical deceleration, in contrast to the default clinical momentum observed in the United States.

Indexed as

DementiaTerminal CareAdultCaregiversDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40638117
PMCPMC12246877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.