ArticleJAMA network open2025
Systemic Strategies to Prevent Nonbeneficial Treatments Near the End of Life.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Retrospective National Cohort Study of Trends in Mechanical Ventilation Among Veterans Living With Dementia, 2010-2019.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- How do intensive care physicians wish to die? A cross-sectional study on end-of-life preferences and the role of palliative care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Communication Surrounding Treatment Preferences for Older Adults With Dementia During Emergency Medical Services Response.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: There exists a default toward high-intensity treatments near the end of life in the United States, including for people living with advanced dementia (PLWD). Clinical momentum, a cascade of increasingly intensive treatments facilitated by systemic factors, contributes to this default. The intensity of treatments provided to PLWD near the end of life is lower in Great Britain. Using Great Britain as a counterexample to the United States, this study examines factors that may contribute to lower-intensity treatment patterns. Objective: To understand factors within the British health care system that shape treatment intensity for PLWD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used semistructured, in-depth interviews with clinicians at 1 National Health Service (NHS) trust in South London and with caregivers of PLWD in England and Wales. Interviews were conducted between February 2021 and February 2023. Perspectives on factors influencing treatment escalation decisions in PLWD were elicited. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the individual-, institutional-, and system-level factors that affect treatment escalation decisions among PLWD in Great Britain. Results: A total of 13 clinicians (11 [84.6%] women; 3 [23.1%] Asian or Asian British, 1 [7.7%] Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African, and 9 [69.2%] White; median [range] years in practice, 26 [8-35]) and 14 caregivers (8 [57.1%] women; 3 [21.4%] Asian or Asian British, 2 [14.3%] Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African, and 8 [57.1%] White; median [IQR] age among 13 who provided data, 32 [28-45] years) participated. Caregiver respondents discussed individual-level factors preventing escalation to high-intensity treatments (transparent communication and knowledge of dementia trajectory). Clinician and caregiver respondents described institutional-level factors (eg, protocols, resources, and practices) and system-level factors (eg, national policies, laws, and cultural norms) shaping treatment escalation decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of clinicians and caregivers in Great Britain, respondents reported individual-, institutional-, and system-level factors that they perceived to both independently and collectively prevent potentially nonbeneficial treatment escalation, including to life-sustaining treatments, and facilitate deescalation in PLWD. These factors created structured opportunities for clinicians and caregivers to deliberate on decisions to escalate treatment intensity. The convergence of these factors generated a clinical practice pattern minimizing escalation toward high-intensity treatments in PLWD, referred to here as clinical deceleration, in contrast to the default clinical momentum observed in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.