Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638114›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid and Tau Biomarker Changes Across the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum.

Diederick M de Leeuw, Calvin Trieu, Ellen M Vromen, Elena R Blujdea, Inge M W Verberk, Flora H Duits, Charlotte E Teunissen, Yolande A L Pijnenburg, Wiesje M van der Flier, Argonde C van Harten and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Progress on prognostic assessment methods for mild cognitive impairment].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Diederick M de LeeuwAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Calvin TrieuAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ellen M VromenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elena R BlujdeaDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, the Netherlands.
Inge M W VerberkDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, the Netherlands.
Flora H DuitsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Charlotte E TeunissenDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, the Netherlands.
Yolande A L PijnenburgAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Argonde C van HartenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pieter Jelle VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Betty M TijmsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The trajectories of core Alzheimer disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and the concurrent cognitive changes across the clinical spectrum remain unclear yet are important for clinical trial design. Objective: To map longitudinal CSF amyloid, tau, and cognitive trajectories along the clinical spectrum of AD and amyloid-negative controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study included participants with a minimum of 2 CSF samples from Alzheimer Centrum Amsterdam cohorts across the AD clinical spectrum (ie, abnormal amyloid levels at first visit, in different clinical stages) and cognitively normal controls with initially normal CSF markers from November 2003 to July 2019. The maximum follow-up period was 19.5 years (median [IQR], 2 [0-3] years). Data were analyzed from March 2024 to May 2025. Exposures: AD biomarkers (ß-amyloid [Aß]1-42 to Aß1-40 ratio, total tau [t-tau], and phosphorylated tau [p-tau]) detected in serially collected CSF. Main Outcomes and Measures: CSF AD biomarkers were measured with Lumipulse G600II. Cognition was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and delayed memory recall component of the of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Analysis was conducted using linear mixed models, including random intercepts and slopes, adjusting for age, education level, and sex. Each model included an interaction term of time and clinical stage to study stage-specific slopes. Biomarker conversion rates per clinical stage were studied by comparing biomarker status between visits. Results: The sample included 197 individuals (103 male [52.3%]), including 83 controls (mean [SD] age, 63 [8] years), 31 individuals with amyloid positivity who were cognitively unimpaired (mean [SD] age, 67 [9] years), 30 individuals with amyloid-positive mild cognitive impairment (MCI; mean [SD] age, 67 [7] years), and 53 individuals with amyloid-positive dementia (mean [SD] age, 65 [8] years). Aβ1-42/1-40 ratios decreased in controls (β [SE] = -8.55 × 10-4 [1.87 × 10-4]; P < .001) and the amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired group (β [SE] = -1.05 × 10-3 [3.14 × 10-4]; P < .001), and remained low in amyloid-positive MCI and dementia groups. There were 10 controls (12.0%) who reached abnormal amyloid over a mean (SD) of 4.8 (3.4) years. In controls, CSF t-tau (β [SE] = 8.49 [2.55] pg/mL per year; P = .002) and p-tau (β [SE] = 1.36 [0.41] pg/mL per year; P = .001) levels increased over time, and levels also increased for those in the amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired (t-tau: β [SE] = 17.24 [4.58] pg/mL per year; P < .001; p-tau: β [SE] = 3.10 [0.72] pg/mL per year; P < .001) and amyloid-positive MCI (t-tau: β [SE] = 30.80 [5.99] pg/mL per year; P < .001; p-tau: β [SE] = 4.40 [0.93] pg/mL per year; P < .001) groups, with t-tau increasing further in the dementia group (β [SE] = 24.97 [7.80] pg/mL per year; P = .002). Longitudinal increases in p-tau and t-tau were steeper in the amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired and MCI groups than in controls, with 10 controls (12.0%) reaching abnormal p-tau and 12 controls (14.5%) reaching abnormal t-tau levels. Delayed recall declined most in the amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired group (β [SE] = -0.31 [0.07]; P < .001) and was associated with CSF amyloid levels (β [SE] = 102.29 [47.30]; P = .03). MMSE scores declined most in individuals with amyloid-positive MCI (β [SE] = -1.25 [0.12]; P < .001) and dementia (β [SE] = -1.89 [0.13]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, CSF amyloid decreased toward abnormal levels in controls, declined further in the amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired group , and was concurrent with decline of delayed recall; CSF amyloid stabilized in those with amyloid-positive MCI and dementia, while tau markers became increased (ie, more abnormal) in the amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired and amyloid-positive MCI groups, suggesting that increase in CSF tau requires abnormal amyloid.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersMAPT protein, humanPeptide Fragmentstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40638114
PMCPMC12246881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.