Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638102›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2025

Prospects for therapeutic T-cell vaccine strategies for HIV cure.

Beatriz Mothe, Christian Brander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beatriz MotheDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol.
Christian BranderIrsiCaixa, Badalona.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review article aims to summaries the advances in T-cell vaccination as a component of HIV cure strategies. Recent clinical trials of therapeutic vaccination showing small but intriguing efficacy signals, provide the field with the data necessary to embark on informed combination strategies that build on these advances. The review focusses on aspects of T-cell immunogen design and vector use for vaccination, and discusses the effects of adjuvants and combination strategies on vaccine-induced immunity and their impact on virus control in people with HIV who undergo an analytical treatment interruption. RECENT

findingsVaccine-induced virus-specific T-cell immunity has been linked to relative control of viral replication in several recent clinical trials. Different immunogen concepts have also entered clinical trials, but for only a few are there immunogenicity and efficacy data available. New initiatives that leverage innate immune mechanisms show some interesting prospect to improve antiviral immunity. The available data also indicate that the preexisting T-cell immunity plays an important role in the strength and breadth of the vaccine-induced immunity. SUMMARY: With some efficacy data supporting the role of antiviral T-cell immunity, strategies that improve this response further can be delineated and incorporated into future, more potent combination approaches.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesHIV InfectionsT-LymphocytesHumansAIDS Vaccinescombination strategiesHIV cureimmunogenT-cell vaccination

Identifiers

PMID40638102
PMCPMC12337920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.