ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Inferring coexistence likelihood in changing environments from ecological time series.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biotic interactions shape the realized niche of toxic cyanobacteria.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Forecasting cyanobacterial blooms requires improved understanding of species interactions.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- The LV map leads to misleading interpretations of coexistence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Reply to Ernst and Spaak: The LV-map accurately estimates species interactions even when functional responses are nonlinear.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inferring coexistence metrics, such as niche and fitness differences, in changing environments is key for understanding the mechanism behind species coexistence and predicting its likelihood. However, it first requires estimating the per capita interactions between organisms and their intrinsic growth rates-parameters that are typically measured by isolating organisms from their natural context. Here, we first use weighted multivariate regression on the per capita growth rates of populations to estimate these key ecological parameters directly from time-series data of species-rich communities. Second, we infer niche differences and species resistance, which are two important metrics for understanding species coexistence. Our approach allows these metrics to vary over time and under different environmental conditions. We validate our approach using synthetic data and apply it to both experimental and observational data as a proof of concept. Experimental results show an expected allocative trade-off between grazing resistance and rapid growth in algae. Moreover, coexistence likelihood decreases, and coexistence balance is disturbed under stressful environmental conditions. Observational data suggests variations in intrinsic growth rates and per capita interactions among autotrophic guilds with respect to seasonal patterns. In addition, interactions between cyanobacteria with green algae and chrysophytes might indicate a potential cause for bloom development. Our approach offers a powerful toolbox to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying ecological dynamics, species coexistence, and community structures under varying environments. Such an understanding will help us address important ecological and evolutionary questions, such as explaining biodiversity patterns and solving the problem of cyanobacteria bloom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.