Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638039›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

BioID in Bacteria: Selection of a Suitable Biotin Ligase for Proxeome Mapping.

Laure Simoens, Veronique Jonckheere, Petra Van Damme

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laure Simoens *iRIP Unit, Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Veronique JonckheereiRIP Unit, Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Petra Van DammeiRIP Unit, Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. petra.vandamme@ugent.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-027X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the initial use of BirA* for proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID), researchers have explored variations of, and alternatives to, this specific biotin ligase enzyme. The application of these biotin ligase modules across diverse model systems has shown advancements in biotinylation efficiency and reduced labeling time. However, these improvements have also introduced challenges, such as increased background labeling. Bacterial BioID, a relatively recent development, is currently limited to studying bait proteins using miniTurbo- and TurboID-based fusions. So far, a comprehensive comparative analysis of the various promiscuous biotin ligases (PBLs) has been reported for only one bacterial species. In this chapter, we present a practical guide for selecting the most effective PBL tailored to the specific requirements of the bait and its corresponding model system for BioID-based interactome mapping in bacteria. Using the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium type III effector protein SopB as a case study, we highlight a pioneering exploration of endogenous effector interactions directly within bacterial cells.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiotinCarbon-Nitrogen LigasesProtein Interaction MappingSalmonella typhimuriumBiotinylationBacterial ProteinsBiotinCarbon-Nitrogen LigasesBiotin ligaseBiotinylation efficiencyInteractomicsProxeomeProximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID)Proximity labelingSalmonellaSopBType III effector (T3E)

Identifiers

PMID40638039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.