Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637992›Full record

ReviewNeotropical entomology2025

A Review on Novel Formulations and Delivery Systems of Botanical Insecticides for Enhanced Efficacy.

Rahul Kumar, Rupinder Kaur, Aditya Singh Ranout, Gireesh Nadda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neotropical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rahul KumarAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201 002, India.
Rupinder KaurAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201 002, India.
Aditya Singh RanoutAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201 002, India.
Gireesh NaddaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201 002, India. girish@ihbt.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7321-7951

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India HCP-0037Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India HCP-0101Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India NWP-0100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing demand for eco-friendly pest management solutions has sparked a renewed interest in botanical insecticides. These plant-based insecticides offer a more sustainable option compared to synthetic chemicals, minimizing harm to non-target organisms. Nevertheless, certain challenges like rapid degradation, low stability, and limited efficacy in field conditions have hindered their extensive adoption. This review thoroughly examines recent developments in formulations and delivery techniques with the goal of enhancing the effectiveness of botanical insecticides. In addition, we explore innovative methods such as nanoformulations, encapsulating technologies, and controlled release systems to improve the stability, bioavailability, and targeted delivery of these natural substances. Furthermore, the paper highlights the significance of synergists and adjuvants in enhancing the effectiveness of insecticides and addressing resistance issues in pest populations. Through a thorough analysis of existing research and the identification of important areas that need further exploration, this review seeks to offer valuable insights that can contribute to the creation of botanical insecticide products that are both more efficient and commercially successful. In addition, a comprehensive list of market products that utilize these innovative formulations is also included.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsInsect ControlInsecticidesPlantsAnimalsDrug CompoundingInsecticidesBionanocarrierEncapsulationInsect PestNanoformulationsPolymer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.