ArticleCell and tissue banking2025
10-years analysis of cryobag fracture in a large inventory of cellular therapy products: rates and risk factors.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryobags play a critical role in freezing, storing, and transporting cellular therapy products but are prone to fractures, which can disrupt patient outcomes and facility workflows. This study evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and impact of cryobag fractures in a large inventory of cellular therapy products in Brazil. A retrospective cohort study included 4514 cryobags from 2262 peripheral blood stem cell collections processed between 2015 and 2024 at a single center supporting nine transplant facilities. Cryobags were frozen at - 80 °C and stored in nitrogen tanks. Fractures and leaks were identified through routine visual inspections. Among the cryobags, 15 (0.3%) fractured, with 12 detected at processing facility and 3 after release. The fracture rate was 0.37 per 100 bag-years, with a cumulative incidence of 1% at 3.62 years. Of these, 8 were discarded, and 7 were salvaged and infused into six patients. Two salvaged cryobags underwent bedside recovery, while five were recovered aseptically in the processing facility. Positive bacterial cultures were commonly found in salvaged products. In multivariate analysis, a higher total nucleated cell count per cryobag remained an independent risk factor for fracture (OR = 1.005; 95% CI: 1.0002-1.0099; p = 0.046). Following implementation of quality improvement initiatives based on root cause analysis, no further fractures were observed. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring cell concentration and adjusting cryopreservation protocols to mitigate risks. Adding overwraps may provide additional protection for cryobags at higher risk, reducing the likelihood of microbial contamination and improving the safety and reliability of cellular therapy products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40637944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.