ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2025
Optimizing Cheyletus malaccensis releases for the biocontrol of Liposcelis bostrychophila: Density-dependent efficacy in stored grains.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- House dust mites in three contrasting climatic regions of Saudi Arabia.Experimental & applied acarology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cheyletus malaccensis (Oudemans), a generalist predatory mite, is a highly promising biocontrol agent applied for stored products pests management in grain storage systems. To optimize its field deployment, this study evaluated the population dynamics of C. malaccensis and Liposcelis bostrychophila (Badonnel) under varying predator-prey ratios (PPRs: 1:9, 1:5, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1) at 26.0 ± 0.1 °C and 75.0 ± 0.5% relative humidity in simulated grain storage environments. During the 49-day post-release period, the peak population reduction rates of L. bostrychophila at four PPRs (1:5, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1) reached 74.87%, 76.61%, 87.10%, and 95.90% respectively, whereas the 1:9 PPR treatment resulted in progressive pest population growth. Conversely, C. malaccensis population establishment rates increased exponentially with decreasing PPRs, peaking at 1,161.11% (1:9 PPR). These findings demonstrate a density-dependent trade-off: higher PPRs maximize short-term pest suppression, while lower ratios enhance long-term predator persistence. Therefore, we propose a two-phase deployment strategy: (i) preventive low-density releases (PPR < 1:5) prior to pest outbreaks to establish mite populations, and (ii) threshold-triggered supplementary releases based on real-time pest monitoring to achieve economical and long-term control of stored grain pests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40637901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.