ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Knowledge, awareness and recommendation on micronutrition during pregnancy-a survey of healthcare providers.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- High prevalence of magnesium supplementation during pregnancy: results from the LIFE Child study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Observational
- Article
- Adherence to vitamin and dietary supplement intake in fertility and pregnancy care: insights into knowledge, information satisfaction, and formulation variability.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Highly informed, yet undersupported: dietary supplement use, information sources, and perceived risks among pregnant vegans in German-speaking regions-findings from the VedieS study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe market for dietary supplements targeting women of reproductive age and pregnant individuals is rapidly expanding. Despite accumulating evidence regarding the benefits of specific micronutrients during pregnancy, there is considerable variability in international and national guidelines, compounded by knowledge gaps among healthcare professionals.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and counseling practices of midwives and physicians in Germany concerning micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among healthcare professionals in Frankfurt and surrounding regions in April to May 2024. A newly developed 24-item questionnaire was utilized to gather demographic data, assess counseling practices related to micronutrients and knowledge concerning of the roles of folic acid, vitamin D, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids in fetal development. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).
resultsOf the 360 individuals who accessed the survey, 107 completed it (33 midwives, 72 physicians). While 96.8% recommended supplementation during pregnancy, only 48.1% rated their knowledge as moderate. Folic acid was most frequently recommended supplement (78.7%), followed by omega-3 fatty acids (68%) and vitamin B12 (notably for vegan diets, 96.1%). Gaps in knowledge were identified, particularly regarding the biochemical forms of folate (34.5% unaware), sources and function of omega-3 fatty acids (20% lacked knowledge), and the role of vitamin B12 in fetal development (19% unaware). Only 41.8% explicitly recommended vitamin D, despite strong evidence of its importance. The majority of respondents expressed a strong interest in further education (91.0%).
conclusionAlthough healthcare professionals are generally engaged in counseling on prenatal supplementation, substantial knowledge gaps and inconsistent practices persist, particularly regarding newer recommendations beyond folic acid. To improve maternal and fetal health outcomes, there is a pressing need for improved educational initiatives and the broader implementation of tools such as the FIGO nutrition checklist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.