ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Matrix Radiofrequency Combined with Myofascial Manipulation in the Treatment of Myofascial Pelvic Pain: A Retrospective Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study is aimed at evaluating the clinical efficacy of matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation in the treatment of myofascial pelvic pain (MPP) and to assess its effects on pain relief and pelvic floor muscle function improvement.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 87 MPP patients treated at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2024. According to their treatment modalities, patients were divided into the observation group (matrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation) and the control group (myofascial manipulation alone). Pain levels and pelvic floor muscle function were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and pelvic floor surface electromyography by Glazer evaluation before and after treatment in both groups.
resultsAfter the treatment course, the VAS scores significantly decreased in both groups. However, the post-treatment VAS score in the observation group (1.21 ± 0.95) was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.76 ± 0.80), with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). The Glazer evaluation of pelvic floor muscles showed that the improvements in fast-twitch contraction, tonic contraction, and endurance contraction in the observation group were significantly greater than those in the control group (p < 0.001), and the reduction in resting electromyographic amplitude was also more pronounced. Moreover, the overall effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05).
conclusionMatrix radiofrequency combined with myofascial manipulation is significantly more effective than myofascial manipulation alone in alleviating pain and improving pelvic floor muscle function in patients with MPP. This combination therapy provides a safe and effective treatment option, which can significantly improve the clinical efficacy of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.