Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637822›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

The Understanding of Complex Syntax in Children From 5 to 9 Years, Using a Novel Assessment Approach - The Test of Complex Syntax- Electronic (TECS-E).

Pauline Frizelle, Ana Oliveira-Buckley, Tricia Biancone, Jorge Oliveira, Paul Fletcher, Dorothy V M Bishop, Cristina McKean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pauline FrizelleDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-3788
Ana Oliveira-BuckleyDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Tricia BianconeDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Jorge OliveiraSchool of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-6174
Paul FletcherDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Dorothy V M BishopDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cristina McKeanDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Health Research Board, Ireland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe present study investigated English-speaking 5-9 year olds' (n = 600, normative sample) comprehension of relative, adverbial and complement clauses using the Test of Complex Syntax-Electronic (TECS-E), an online interactive assessment. with strong test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and internal consistency.

methodUsing an opt out protocol three groups of children were recruited from schools-a sample for whom we could ascertain test-retest reliability (n = 122), a sample to explore concurrent validity, using the Test for the Reception of Grammar (TROG-2) (n = 131) and a main normative sample (n = 906). The main sample was reduced to 600, to ensure that the final sample accurately represented the population of the Republic of Ireland, with respect to sex, socio-economic status and locale. Children completed the TECS-E independently in groups within their pre/school classroom. The TROG-2 was administered individually.

resultsScores increased with age from 5-9 years with considerable growth in development between 5;06 and 7 years, suggesting that 7 years is an important milestone in children's understanding of complex syntax. Girls performed significantly better than boys, particularly between 6 and 7 years. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds scored significantly lower than those who were more affluent, until 7 years, and this was more marked in boys than in girls. Children performed highest on relative clauses, followed by complement clauses, and last on adverbial clauses.

conclusionThis study provides a developmental hierarchy as well as important information regarding growth in English-speaking children's understanding of complex syntactic structures in the early school years and how this interacts with sex as well as social disadvantage. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Complex sentences play a crucial role in children's language and literacy development. They become increasingly relevant as children progress through school, from both an academic and social perspective. Despite this, we lack a comprehensive picture of children's understanding of these types of sentences. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This is the first study to report on a large sample of English-speaking children's understanding of complex syntactic structures between 5 and 9 years. In addition, the assessment tool used (the TECS-E) has been designed to reflect how children process language in everyday interactions, and to include constructions that follow the linguistic patterns of those that children say and hear in natural discourse. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study furnishes a reference dataset of the growth in typically developing children's understanding of complex sentences. This information can be used by clinicians to identify gaps in understanding and to guide the design and delivery of syntactic interventions.

Indexed as

Child LanguageComprehensionLanguage TestsLinguisticsSemanticsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIrelandMaleReproducibility of Resultsassessmentcomprehensionlanguageschool‐aged childrensyntax

Identifiers

PMID40637822
PMCPMC12244311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.