ArticleDiscover nano2025
Mass and stiffness sensing performance of nanomechanical resonators: viability of infectious virus detection.
Article in Discover nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical amplification and mass sensing in a spin qubit-nanomechanical resonator hybrid system.iScience · 2026Article
- Dip-in Nanomechanical Probes for Mass Characterization of Nanoparticles in Ultra-Low Volume Liquid Suspensions.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examine the performance of nanomechanical resonators for mass and stiffness sensing of nanoparticulate analytes with focus on their application for untargeted infectious virus detection. The characteristic narrow mass distributions of viruses, together with the existing correlations between their stiffness and infectivity, point out to nanomechanical sensors as a particularly suited alternative to molecular detection techniques, constrained by limited processing speed, target-specificity, and the inability to directly assess infectivity. We present a theoretical analysis of the response of flexural beam resonators to the adsorption of nanoparticulate analytes, and derive analytical expressions for the mass and stiffness sensing responsivity, resolution and signal to noise ratio as a function of the beam characteristics and analyte adsorption parameters. We demonstrate that both the mass and stiffness of viruses can contribute to resonance frequency shifts that significantly exceed the fundamental detection limits of beams with plausible dimensions and for realistic adsorption parameters. Particularly, stiffness resolution can reach levels well below the stiffness variations observed in some viruses as a consequence of maturation, enabling an integrated approach for infectivity assessment. We conclude that the practical application of nanomechanical spectrometry for infectious virus detection is not limited by the performance of state-of-the-art sensor technology, but by the efficiency of analyte delivery methods, encouraging future research on optimizing their implementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.