Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637776›Full record

ReviewNeotropical entomology2025

Host Plant Resistance: Is It Time for a New Model?

Bruno H S Souza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neotropical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bruno H S SouzaDept of Entomology, Federal Univ of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG, Brazil. brunosouza@ufla.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2802-2688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host plant resistance (HPR) is a fundamental control tactic in integrated pest management programs. The evaluation of plant varieties for the expression of resistance against major insect pests is a key step for recommending and deploying resistant varieties in crops where pest pressure is high. Therefore, the use and publicizing of appropriate terminologies on HPR have a pivotal role in conveying information on effective resistant varieties to the scientific community and farmers. Basically, there are two HPR terminologies being used in the Entomology scientific literature: the classical HPR definition based on the trichotomous model of resistance, i.e., antixenosis, antibiosis, and tolerance; and a more recent proposition dividing plant defense into resistance vs. tolerance, the sichotomous model, which also incorporates the concepts of constitutive vs. induced resistance and direct vs. indirect resistance. In addition, there is scarce information on insect-resistance levels in commercial plant varieties to be divulged in seed labels, with exception of the Bt transgenic varieties. Using unstandardized technical terms on HPR can be confusing and less likely to transmit proper information on resistant varieties, hindering their use in the field. This review discusses the terminologies on HPR, the research gaps, and proposes a concept of what should be considered a resistant variety for practical purposes and uses by farmers, extension services, and the scientific public. Finally, the proposed HPR defense-growth model is presented for appreciation.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalInsectaPlant Defense Against HerbivoryAnimalsPlants, Genetically ModifiedAntibiosisAntixenosisConstitutive resistanceInduced resistanceTolerance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.