ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2025
Trophic Ecology of the Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) and Bengal Whipray (Brevitrygon imbricata) Harvested by Sri Lankan Fisheries Based on Stable Isotope Analysis.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sri Lankan fisheries have substantial elasmobranch catches, but the local ecology of individual species is not well characterized. We examine the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) and Bengal whipray (Brevitrygon imbricata), two elasmobranch species with variable life history and feeding ecology that represent differing trophic guilds. Tiger sharks have a global distribution and are well-studied in some regions, but there is a lack of ecological information specific to the Indian Ocean. In contrast, Bengal whiprays are often misidentified at the species level and are thought to largely feed on benthic flatworms. Here, we investigate the trophic ecology of these two species with stable isotope analysis, which tracks the nutrient flow through food webs. Morphometric measurements and samples were obtained from tiger sharks [muscle (n = 24), teeth (n = 17)] and Bengal whiprays [muscle (n = 44)] after boats were onshore; tissues were sampled and dried before transport for stable isotope preparation. Both tiger sharks and Bengal whiprays have a wide range of δ13C values spanning from -17.8 to -14.8‰, indicating diverse feeding habitats. In general, tiger sharks have higher δ15N values (13.3 ± 0.6‰) than Bengal whiprays (12.1 ± 0.7‰), although five Bengal whiprays had similar δ15N values to tiger sharks. There were also δ15N differences by sex among Bengal whiprays, which suggests some foraging or baseline differences within the population. The isotopic differences among market locations were subtle and difficult to discern given differences in sample size. These insights into the ecology of tiger sharks and Bengal whiprays in Sri Lanka, along with other studies, including tagging and stomach content analysis, are critical in developing ecosystem-based management strategies. For example, the identification of essential habitats for the Marine Protected Area designation would restrict fishing and help mitigate impacts on population structure and dynamics, two critical considerations for these two species, which are listed as Near Threatened and Vulnerable, respectively, on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.