ArticleHaematologica2026
Real-world validation study of the LSC17 score for risk prediction in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clonal Metamorphosis: Deconstructing MPN Evolution with Single-Cell and Spatial Multi-Omics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- A stem and progenitor cell-derived gene expression signature is prognostic for survival in myelofibrosis.Blood · 2026Article
- The LSC17 score: a prognostic biomarker now validated for real-world clinical application in acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients exhibit diverse molecular and cytogenetic changes with heterogeneous outcomes. The functionally-derived LSC17 gene expression score has demonstrated strong prognostic significance in retrospective analyses of adult and pediatric AML cohorts, where above-median scores are associated with worse outcomes compared to below-median scores in intensively-treated patients. Here we used a laboratory-developed clinically-validated NanoString-based LSC17 assay to test the prognostic value of the LSC17 score in a prospective multicenter study of 276 newly-diagnosed AML patients. Each patient's score was classified as high or low by comparison to a previously-established reference score. In the entire cohort, a high LSC17 score was associated with poor risk features, including advanced age and unfavorable genetic mutations. In the subset of 190 patients treated intensively, a high LSC17 score was associated with lower remission rates (63% vs. 94% after induction; P<0.0001), presence of measurable residual disease (46% vs. 10%; P<0.0001), and shorter overall survival (OS, 606 days vs. not reached; P=0.0004; hazard ratio [HR] =2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-3.35) and relapse-free survival (RFS, 541 days vs. not reached; P=0.001; HR=1.99; 95% CI: 1.29-3.08). In multivariable analysis considering age, white blood cell count and European LeukemiaNet 2022 risk groups, the LSC17 score remained an independent predictor of RFS and OS. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation improved OS for patients with a high but not a low LSC17 score. This study establishes the real-world value of the LSC17 score as a robust tool for risk assessment in AML and paves the way for its incorporation into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.