ArticleJACC. Clinical electrophysiology2025
Development and Clinical Validation of a Cross-Sex Translator of ECG Drug Responses.
Article in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex-specific human electromechanical multiscale in-silico models for virtual therapy evaluation.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSex differences in cardiac electrophysiology critically affect arrhythmia risk and therapeutic responses. Female subjects are at a higher risk of drug-induced torsade de pointes and sudden cardiac death, largely due to longer QTc intervals, compared with male subjects. However, the underrepresentation of female subjects in both basic and clinical research creates biases that limit our understanding of sex-specific arrhythmia mechanisms, risk metrics, and treatment outcomes.
objectivesThe authors aimed to develop a quantitative tool that predicts ECG features in female subjects based on data from male subjects (and vice versa) by combining biophysical models of human ventricular electrophysiology and statistical regression models.
methodsMale and female ventricular tissue models were constructed incorporating transmural heterogeneity and sex-specific parameterizations, and pseudo-ECGs were derived from these models. Multivariable lasso (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression was used to generate sets of regression coefficients (a cross-sex translator) that map male ECG features to female ECG features.
resultsThe translator successfully predicted drug-induced effects on simulated female ECG features using simulated male ECG data as input, with an average discrepancy <5%. In addition, a proof-of-concept clinical application using ECG data from age-matched male and female subjects showed that the translator predicted relative drug-induced changes in female ECG features from corresponding male data under various drug regimens with an average error <6%.
conclusionsWe propose our cross-sex ECG translator as a novel digital health tool that can facilitate sex-specific cardiac safety assessments, ensuring that pharmacotherapy is safe and effective across sexes, which is a major step forward in addressing disparities in cardiac treatment for female subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.