Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637595›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2025

Real-world retention of newer ASMs, including lacosamide and brivaracetam as first or second therapies in adult-onset epilepsy.

André Idegård, David Larsson, Johan Zelano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

André IdegårdDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9200-023X
David LarssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-951X
Johan ZelanoDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-4545

Funding

Familjen Knut och Ragnvi Jacobssons foundationSvenska Läkaresällskapet SLS-881501Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning S18-0040Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement ALFGBG-1006343Vetenskapsrådet 2023-02816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNewer antiseizure medications (ASMs), such as lacosamide and brivaracetam, have promising retention in clinical trials but real-world data on their effectiveness when used as first or second treatments is missing. Because newer ASMs are often reserved for severe cases, such knowledge accumulates slowly. We utilized nationwide "big data" and aimed to evaluate real-world retention of these ASMs when used early in the disease course.

methodsWe used longitudinal national register data to identify all adults with incident ASM-treated epilepsy in Sweden from 2007-2021. ASMs were tracked up to 2023, with recurring dispensations indicating continued treatment. Retention rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier for each ASM as the first, second, or subsequent use (third ASM or later) with stratification for age and sex. Adjusted Cox regression was used to verify the risk of lacosamide discontinuation in comparison to levetiracetam.

resultsWe followed 49 489 adults for a median of 5 years (Q1-Q3, 3-10). The 5-year retention rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of lacosamide were 42% (32%-55%) as first ASM and 61% (55%-67%) as second ASM among individuals 18-49 year of age, and 61% (53%-71%) and 69% (64%-74%) among 50 years or older, respectively. Lacosamide retention was comparable to lamotrigine and levetiracetam, but higher as a second ASM in younger adults and in men. The 3-year retention rate of brivaracetam as the second ASM among adults ≥50 years was 77% (95% CI 68%-88%). First or second treatment with cenobamate, eslicarbazepine, or perampanel was rare. The likelihood of discontinuing lacosamide as first ASM did not differ significantly from levetiracetam in univariable or adjusted Cox modeling. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide and brivaracetam have at least similar real-world retention as lamotrigine or levetiracetam when used early in adult-onset epilepsy. This widens the therapeutic arsenal and the possibility of tailored ASM selection.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsyLacosamidePyrrolidinonesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLevetiracetamLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSwedenTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsbrivaracetamLacosamideLevetiracetamPyrrolidinonesantiepileptic drugantiseizure medicationdiscontinuationlacosamideseizure

Identifiers

PMID40637595
PMCPMC12661259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.