ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2025
Evaluating Trauma Scores for Mortality Prediction in Pediatric Patients.
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various trauma scoring systems in predicting mortality in pediatric patients with multiple trauma and to determine their cut-off values. Materials and Methods: A methodological study was conducted on pediatric patients under 18 years of age admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit for multiple trauma. Demographic data, clinical parameters, and trauma scores, including the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score III (PRISM-3), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD-2), were collected and analyzed. Results: Among the 107 patients, there were 15 deaths (14%). Significant differences were observed between survivors and non-survivors in all trauma scores. Non-survivors had higher AIS, ISS, PRISM-3, and PELOD-2 scores, while survivors had higher PTS, RTS, and GCS scores (P < .001). In the multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, both ISS (odds ratio [OR] 1.060 [95% CI: 1.029-1.092], P < .001) and RTS (OR 0.059 [95% CI: 0.007-0.517], P =.011) were independently associated with mortality. Injury Severity Score demonstrated the highest area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.98 in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Conclusion: Both ISS and RTS were identified as independent predictors of mortality in pediatric trauma patients. Injury Severity Score was the strongest predictor, while RTS also provided significant prognostic value. Integration of these scores into early assessment may enhance risk stratification and support clinical decision-making in pediatric trauma care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.