ArticleMicrobial genomics2025
skDER and CiDDER: two scalable approaches for microbial genome dereplication.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative pangenomics unveils distinct host adaptation trends and conserved biosynthetic potential in microbiome Clostridia.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Global multi-host genomic epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannii reveals transmission at one health interfaces.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A widespread gut bacterial lineage distinguished by redox metabolism and phage defense.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An abundance of microbial genomes have been sequenced in the past two decades. For fundamental comparative genomic investigations, where the goal is to determine the major gain and loss events shaping the pangenome of a species or broader taxon, it is often unnecessary and computationally onerous to include all available genomes in studies. In addition, the over-representation of specific lineages due to sampling and sequencing bias can have undesired effects on evolutionary analyses. To assist users with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.