Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637370›Full record

ArticlePrehospital emergency care2026

Inter-Rater Reliability and Acceptability of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

David G Dillon, Colleen Kellison, Juan Carlos C Montoy, Joanna Sokol, Ralph C Wang, Robert M Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prehospital emergency care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David G DillonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
Colleen KellisonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Juan Carlos C MontoyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7438-0243
Joanna SokolSan Francisco Fire Department, Emergency Medical Services, San Francisco, California.
Ralph C WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5382-9486
Robert M RodriguezDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California.

Funding

Improving the Identification of Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestK38HL165363 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DILLON, DAVID G · 2023 to 2024
$212k
NHLBI NIH HHS K38 HL165363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOne-in-six cases of atraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in North America are thought to be precipitated by opioid overdose, but many of these cases are not obvious and there is no gold standard used by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel to identify opioid-associated (OA)-OHCA. The NAloxone Cardiac ARrest Decision Instrument (NACARDI) was developed and validated to identify potential OA-OHCA, however it has not yet been used in the field. We sought to prospectively assess the inter-rater reliability and acceptability of NACARDI in real-world OHCA.

methodsEmergency medical service clinicians evaluated the NACARDI criteria during acute resuscitations of patients with OHCA in San Francisco between September 2022-February 2024. The NACARDI rule utilized in this study consisted of two criteria: patient age <60 years and unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Clinicians completed a short survey that included free-text questions, multiple choice question, and Likert-type scales rating NACARDI's ease of use, describing when during the resuscitation they were able to assess NACARDI, and identifying potential barriers. In cases where two clinicians completed NARCADI assessments for a single OHCA case, we calculated a kappa coefficient of agreement.

resultsEmergency medical service clinicians evaluated 149 cases of OHCA and completed 198 surveys - 100 (67.1%) cases had one survey response and 49 (32.9%) had survey responses from two EMS personnel. Clinicians were able to ascertain NACARDI criteria "prior to or during the first cardiac rhythm check" in 80.3% of cases. NACARDI was reported as "easy to use" by 83.3% of respondents. The overall Kappa coefficient for NACARDI was 0.73 (95%CI 0.51-0.95). The three most common reasons why NACARDI criteria were deemed difficult to ascertain were chaotic scene, language barrier, and unreliable bystander accounts.

conclusionsThere was reasonable agreement in how NACARDI was interpreted for OHCA cases and the majority of surveyed EMS clinicians found NACARDI easy to use. These findings suggest that NACARDI can be reliably and easily used by EMS clinicians during acute OHCA resuscitations to identify OA-OHCA patients, potentially informing inclusion criteria for future research studies and guiding targeted interventions for this patient population.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidClinical Decision RulesOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAdultEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSan FranciscoAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID40637370
PMCPMC12252226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.